Spurs are hardly strapped for cash, and they're pushing to finish in the top 4. Why would they sell him?

Relatório de Abuso

Defoe - 11 goals in 13 matches Before wigan match Defoe - 6 goals in 12 matches Excluding hatrick against hull City Defoe - 3 goals in 11 matches 1. Even if Defoe had not scored any goals against Wigan and Hull, Spurs would have won 2. Hull and Wigan are crap teams. 3. Defoe has been shit against big teams. 4. Defoe is not good enough for United (Rooney and Berba) , Chelsea (drogba and anelka), Liverpool (torres) and Arsenal ( Van persie and Arshavin). ***************************************************************************************************************** Bent has scored 9 goals in 13 matches -- Almost every goals were match deciders and very valuable from team's point of view. Several of them were against big teams. This is what you need from the striker.

Relatório de Abuso

I have to say i always thought united should have bought him back around when we signed saha. he would have been reasonably cheap and would have been an out an out striker with pace. that said as has been pointed out, there is a question mark over his ability to perform against the big teams. Being PL top scorer isn't a big deal if its only because of hat tricks against the likes of hull and wigan. he has to consistently deliver against top of the table teams. we'll see in may.....

Relatório de Abuso

lol i dnt think that would work rooneys been great playing in the centre and theres no way torres would come to united, i think united shoudl buy villa as for defoe he needs to prove himself against the top team

Relatório de Abuso